How to ensure success and avoid failure in Internet Marketing – Brand New Workshop

When it comes to marketing your business on the internet, if you “aren’t there” you don’t exist.

Statistics show that approximately 26% of all surfers click on the 1st organic search result, dropping to 4.7% for the 2nd organic result, 0.39% on the 9th result, and 1.2% on the 10th result. In addition, only about 2-5% of surfers have a look at page 2 of the search results.

What this means is that you really do need to be on page 1 in order to succeed on the internet. Anything less, and you’ve failed.

It’s quite easy to be #1 for your company name, or for a phrase like “SEO is a science, based on tried-and-true techniques” (we are #1 and #2 for that), but in a competitive market, there will always be key phrases that you want to rank in the top 10, but which are dominated by old, large or well-optimized websites. The question is whether you have a chance to beat them?

And if so, what will it take?

Now THAT is the Sixty-Four Thousand Dollar Question!  No, don’t panic – I hope it won’t take $64,000 for you to get there.

But wouldn’t you rather know if it will before you start?

Let’s just say, hypothetically, that you really DO need $64,000 to get to page 1.

What will happen if you “only” invest $63,000?

And once you’re at the top, what happens if you stop?

If these questions pique your interest, if you would like to hear more, come listen to yours truly, together with Internet Marketing Specialist, Emanuel Hochstadt of TENS Web Marketing this Thursday, the 24th of June, From 17:00 to 20:00, in Rehavia, Jerusalem. Price – 150 NIS plus vat.

You can register at:

Emanuel:  emanuel@tenswebmarketing.com, or 02-5664676.

Debi: debi@debi-z.com, http://www.debi-z.com/contact-debiz-seo-consulting/ or 054-6751237.

MAXIMUM 10 attendees – first come, first served !!

We are planning  to run more sessions, so if you can’t make this one, please do let  us know, and we’ll keep you updated with details about future sessions.

Looking forward to see you there.

debi-zyx-signature

June 22nd, 2010 by debizyx
Posted in Website Promotion Leave a comment »

Announcing – Learn SEO in English in Jerusalem!!

Dear Readers,

Have you been asking yourselves “what is this SEO stuff all about?”, ” maybe I should change professions?” or “I’ve been looking for a job – but what about being my own boss?”.

Well, maybe we have the answer for you…

Announcing, the Full Track program for Search Engine Optimization (SEO) professionals.

This program has been specifically designed to allow beginners to run their own businesses and become team leaders in the foremost companies in this field.

Jacki Soikis, founder of SEO-Simple, has been running this course professionally for over three years. To date, 17 courses have been held, and the learning material has been updated after each course. More than 350 graduates, who are now the backbone of Israel’s SEO industry, have qualified in these courses.

Participants are exposed to advanced SEO techniques and acquire the most advanced tools and disciplines in this field, fully exploiting the possibilities for cutting expenses and leveraging the web site as a source of income and knowhow for the organization.

Up till now, all courses have been held in Hebrew, and in Tel Aviv.

Now, for the first time, is your opportunity to take part in this cutting-edge course, in Jerusalem, and in English.

You can find full details, including the Value Added of this course, at  http://www.debi-z.com/learn-seo-in-jerusalem/

Looking forward to seeing you all :-)

Debi

debi-zyx-signature

April 14th, 2010 by debizyx
Posted in SEO Leave a comment »

SphinnCon Israel 2010 Takeaways

Sunday, March 7, 2010: A sudden invasion of the campus of Machon Lev by SEO and SEM professionals.

Did they come for the sessions?  The networking with others in the industry?  The  constantly changing array of warming trays and platters containing tempting culinary experiences?  If only they had installed Google Analytics on SphinnCon Israel 2010, we might be able to find out.

Analytics was the topic of one of the sessions, which covered the range of the search engine profession from SEO to SEM to Social Media.  The following are some of the actionable takeaways from the sessions I attended:

A/B Split Testing for Adwords from Dan Perach of PPCPROZ (a very professional, well-presented and practical presentation):

  • while A/B testing can help your performance tremendously, if you don’t have time to be on top of an A/B test – don’t  (simple, seemingly obvious, but overlooked – and definitely applicable to other areas of life as well).
  • when you’re starting a new test in the Search Network, make sure you pause your old ad, clone it and start a new test – or the past history will skew the results.
  • be on top of your tests to know as soon as possible after a test is really over (with a winner or a dead heat) – otherwise you’ll end up losing money to losing ads.  If you have many ads being tested, use a tool to manage the tests and tell you algorithmically when the test is over.
  • matrix the competition – use a competitive research tool like Keyword Spy to look at the top ads for each keyword or adgroup.  Make a chart with the unique feature or benefit each one gives, the call to action, the tone – and then see how you can differentiate your ads from the competition.

Content Network Tips from Naomi Sela of Compucall:

  • optimize by predefining: themes and site lists where you think your ad will succeed.
  • optimize by refining: exclude sites, categories and page types if you see they aren’t bringing you the traffic you want; exclude demographic segments or bid more for a particular age or gender.
  • use a placement performance report to identify your highest converting sites, and then create specific ad copy for those sites.
  • target users who visit sites out of their country (for example, target sites in English, Russian and Arabic – but for visitors with an Israeli IP).

SEO Indexing Tips from Vanessa Fox (no, not the name of a session, but a few tips from a site clinic that she directed):

  • the most accurate way to see how many pages of your site have been indexed by Google is by uploading an XML sitemap to Webmaster Tools – and letting them tell you there how many pages they’ve indexed.  Using the “site:” command is relatively inaccurate (as anyone who has paged to the end knows), and wildly inaccurate for numbers over 1000.
  • if you have a directory site and some of the categories may not have listings, you should programmatically create a single page that will show for any request for which there is no content, otherwise Google may end up indexing lots of pages with different URLs that all say “0 results found” and eventually decide that your site has little worthwhile content. You may not be too happy with the results of that decision.

Thanks to all the presenters and organizers!

March 11th, 2010 by aviva b
Posted in Google, SEO Conferences Leave a comment »

Microformats vs. RDFa – Google Rich Snippets, Part 2

A few weeks ago, I wrote an overview to the semantic web – and how Google’s Rich Snippets feature uses it.  Now it’s time to dive in a little deeper – take your semantic scuba gear along – and discover the differences between different types of semantic markup.

Any type of semantic markup needs to have a vocabulary defined somewhere on the internet – so people can learn what the terms are, and sometimes as an essential part of a computer figuring out what the terms are.

Google officially supports microformats and RDFa:

Microformats

Microformats are a set of vocabularies developed and hosted on microformats.org.  Any interested party can contribute to the development of new and existing vocabularies.  Some of the vocabularies are stable and established and some are drafts and are liable to change.  (Interestingly enough, Google supports the hCard vocabulary for defining People and Organization, which is an established vocabulary, and the hReview vocabulary for defining reviews, which is listed as a draft.  I guess Google assumes it won’t change too much in the future.)

When you use a microformats vocabulary on your webpages, you first define which vocabulary you are using by <div class=”insert vocabulary here“>.  Then you define the term you are using from that vocabulary by <span class=”insert property here“>.

Example: <div class=”hreview”>

Then: <span class=”rating”>

(*note – “div” and “span” are not absolutes – use whatever tag fits with your formatting)

RDFa

RDFa is a practical way of using RDF – Resource Description Framework, which is a description format using “triples” of subject – property – value of the property (or, in their technical terminology, subject – predicate – object).  For example, using our brownie example from last post:

1 cup brown sugar

This statement is about the subject of brown sugar.  It contains an inherent property, which is the amount of brown sugar, and the value of the property which is 1 cup.

There are a number of RDFa vocabularies on the internet – just like microformats, the potential number is infinite.  If you want to write an RDFa vocabulary, go right ahead.  The difference between microformats and RDFa is that while microformat vocabularies are all hosted and edited on the microformats.org website, anyone can write an RDFa vocabulary and host it wherever he wants.

But if the framework is so open, how in the world (wide web :) – does a computer reading your webpage’s code know what you’re referring to?

When you use an RDFa vocabulary on your webpages, you first define the “name space” – the place on the internet where the list of terms and definitions is located.  You do this by writing: <div xmlns:abbreviation for your vocabulary=”URL where your vocabulary is located“  After that, for every property you want to mark up, you write: <span property=”abbreviation for your vocabulary:property>

Example: <div xmlns:dc=”http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"

Then: <span property=”dc:title”>

Huh?  Does that sound confusing to you?  It did to me… and it still does.  Let’s take it slowly.

xmlns is short for “XML name space”, meaning the XML document where your vocabulary is defined.

dc in our example was the abbreviation that the creators chose to stand for the URL where their vocabulary is located (it stands for Dublin Core).

http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ is the URL itself.

Now the computer reading the RDFa knows that when it sees dc in the future, it is going to refer to a term contained within that URL, thus eliminating the need to rewrite the URL of the vocabulary source every single time you define a property.  When you add span property=”dc:title”, you are effectively telling the computer to go to the URL above and find the “title” section to understand what the property means.  The above URL actually redirects to http://dublincore.org/2008/01/14/dcelements.rdf#, making “dc:title” roughly equivalent to http://dublincore.org/2008/01/14/dcelements.rdf#title.

So now you’re about to go create your own RDFa vocabulary so you can mark up your website about your collection of Madagascar hissing cockroaches, with properties like: name, length, favorite food, best trick, decibel level of hiss…

Not so fast.  If you look at Google’s instructions for marking up your website with RDFa, you see that you are instructed to write <div xmlns:v=http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/#”.  This is Google’s name space, where it defines the properties it supports in RDFa.  Currently Google only supports properties relating to people, reviews, products and organizations, and only information relating to people and reviews is actually used for display purposes.  In their latest update on Rich Snippets, Google announced that they will recognize FOAF (the Friend of a Friend vocabulary) and vCard terms that are equivalent to the terms they support.  vCard is one of the earlier published web standards for defining properties of people and organizations – microformats’ hCard and Google’s RDFa definitions are based on this standard.

Which vocabulary to use?

So with your newfound awareness of semantic markup, you now want to go and mark up all your pages using a vocabulary that Google recognizes (your Madagascar hissing cockroaches will have to wait – probably for quite a long time).

But… which vocabulary should you use?  The following is a bit of conjecture, without any definitive conclusions, but may provide food for thought as you make your decision.

Popularity

Microformats have historically (as historical as you can call relatively recent technology advances) been the more popular of the two.  A search on Google Trends shows that “microformats” were searched for a significant enough way to register starting from 2006, whereas “RDFa” only appeared on the significant search scene starting in 2009 – and it’s had its ups and downs.

Google Trends for Microformats and RDFa - since 2006

Google Trends for Microformats and RDFa - since 2006

A closer look at 2009:

Google Trends for Microformats and RDFa - 2009 only

Google Trends for Microformats and RDFa - 2009 only

On the other hand, the quantity of “microformats” search seems to be declining since 2006 – slowly, to be sure, but steadily.

Ease of Use

Microformats seem a little bit simpler to use: take a look at Google’s example for the difference in marking up information about a person in microformats and in RDFa (you have to scroll down a bit on the page for the examples).

On the other hand, do or will CMSs (content management systems) offer built-in support for one or the other?  In the comments to the last blog post on this topic, Amir Simantov mentioned that Drupal has some built-in RDFa capabilities.

If you don’t use a CMS that has those capabilities, can your site programmer build either one more easily into your templates?  (For a client of ours who is building a new e-commerce website, we’re recommending that the programmer look into building these semantic mark-up capabilities into the product pages.)

I posed a question to the SEOmoz staff about preference in which vocabulary to use, but they also hadn’t come to any conclusions.  They did confirm my hesitation about mixing and matching vocabularies – so once you pick one, stick with it.

Are there any other points you think are relevant to deciding which one to use?  Have you had experience with either microformats or RDFa and can share some advice with us?  The comments are waiting for you.

(Okay – how many of you actually clicked on the Madagascar hissing cockroaches site?  Admit it – in the comments.  :) )

December 29th, 2009 by aviva b
Posted in Google, SEO Leave a comment »

SEO Benefits of Google/YouTube’s Automatic Captions?

Hi, all!

We decided to put our latest SEO blog post on SEOmoz’s user generated SEO blog – so check it out over there!

Just to give a brief summary – recently Google announced that YouTube videos (and other videos from Google’s video partners) will be able to have automatic captioning.  Admittedly this is a big step for deaf accessibility, but some SEOs voiced the opinion that having all this new topic-rich text on the page would be of benefit to SEO as well.  When we investigated, however, we saw that in fact the text doesn’t seem to appear anywhere and doesn’t seem to help…

For more details, check out the full blog post (complete with lots of images!) on SEomoz.  Enjoy!

December 15th, 2009 by aviva b
Posted in Google, SEO 2 Comments »

Excel Tip for Title and Description Tag Optimization

Optimizing the title and description tags for hundreds (or even just dozens) of pages? Obviously an Excel spreadsheet is the tool of choice to keep everything neat and orderly. Beyond the neatness, Excel has a number of very helpful features that make a page optimization project much easier. Here’s one tip (thanks to Josh Dreller for his Excel tutorial that inspired this usage):

The different search engines have different maximum lengths for the titles and descriptions that they will show in the SERPs (search engine results pages). Google will show up to 69 characters (including spaces) for the title and up to 156 (including spaces) for the description.

While many content management systems that enable you to add title and description tags to your pages will show you the number of characters, it’s quite frustrating to spend precious time writing the tags only to find out when you copy them into your system that they’re too long. And not all systems have this feature for all the tags. Our WordPress-based system tells us only the number of characters in the description (not the title). Using Excel’s length count and conditional formatting features lets you see length issues at a glance. Here’s how:

Create columns for the page URL, current title, new title, current description and new description. Add in a “length” column after your new title and description.

excel seo tips1

Put the formula len=(cell) into the first cell of the length column, using the cell just to its left in the formula. Copy and paste for the entire column.

You will now see the number of characters (including spaces) contained in your new titles and descriptions.

excel seo tips2

In order to see which titles and descriptions fit the prescribed number of characters, use conditional formatting in the length column. Here’s how:

  1. Select the entire New Title length column, and go to Format>>Conditional Formatting.
  2. In the resulting pop-up box, Condition 1 should be: “Cell Value Is”.
  3. In the next menu, choose “less than or equal to”.
  4. Enter the maximum number of characters allowed (for Google, 69).
  5. Press the “Format” button and then the “Patterns” tab to choose what color you would like the cell to be if your title is the correct length (green is a pretty intuitive choice).
  6. Press “Add” to add a new condition.
  7. For Condition 2, select “Cell Value Is” from the first menu.
  8. In the next menu, choose “greater than”.
  9. Enter the maximum number of characters allowed (for Google, 69).
  10. Press the “Format” button and then the “Patterns” tab to choose what color you would like the cell to be if your title is longer than the correct length (red is the intuitive choice here, but it always seems too harsh to me – I prefer rose).
  11. Press “OK.”
  12. Repeat process for New Description Length column.

excel seo tips3

And there you have it: you can easily and colorfully tell which tags are fine and which need some pruning. I guess we have to fix that “Fans” description. Yes, fans – what did you think a company like “Coolness Is Us” would do?  :)

Any Excel tips of your own? Please enlighten us all!

November 24th, 2009 by aviva b
Posted in SEO Leave a comment »

Google’s Rich Snippets: An Introduction to Semantic Markup

At the end of last month Google announced an update to Rich Snippets. Rich Snippets, which debuted in mid-May of this year, are intended to provide more in-depth information – such as ratings for videos or restaurants or people’s social and professional information – in the snippets on the search result pages, giving the searcher a “richer” searching experience.

An example of Google Rich Snippets: a review of a Chinese restaurant with ratings

debi rich snippet 1

How do Rich Snippets work?

In order to produce a Rich Snippet, Google looks at semantic markup (programming code that explains meanings) that webmasters have added to their pages, marking data that humans understand naturally so that machines can understand it also. Basic HTML has plenty of semantic markup that explains data structure, for example, the <h1> tag to denote a heading or the <p> tag to denote a paragraph.

To see a simple explanation of how more complex semantic markup works, take a look at the following:

brownie recipe rich snippet

You know that what you are looking at is a recipe. (Looks pretty good, no? If you are so tempted that you end up making the recipe, tell us in the comments whether it’s worth it.) You know that the text contains (among other things) the title of the recipe and a list of ingredients consisting of the types of ingredient and how much of each you will need.

If basic HTML is used, all a computer knows is that it is looking at a title and a list that contains numbers. It could be a recipe; it could be the inventory of a store; it could be the list of final grades for Geology 101.

More advanced semantic markup tags different parts of the page with code that “explains” to the computer what the data is referring to, and the relationship between different parts of the data. In the above example, the semantic markup would effectively tell the computer something like this:

<recipe title> Chocolate Chip Cheesecake Brownies

<list of ingredients>

<amount of ingredient>1 <measure of amount>cup <type of ingredient>shortening

<amount of ingredient>1 <measure of amount>cup <type of ingredient>brown sugar

<amount of ingredient>1/2 <measure of amount>cup <type of ingredient>white sugar

<amount of ingredient>1 <measure of amount>teaspoon <type of ingredient>vanilla extract

There are a number of existing vocabulary systems for semantic markup, enabling you to let machines understand and make connections about information on people, organizations, products, locations, events, media, and jobs, among other things (there’s even a vocabulary for recipes!). If all information was tagged, a search engine would ostensibly be able to return “all brownie recipes with no oil that are written by people who live in Oklahoma and are friends of my friends on Facebook.”

We’re not there yet. Google only visibly uses this information for its Rich Snippets, and only for reviews and for social/people profile sites, although they say that they do use the information from other markups. The two systems that Google supports are microformats and RDFa. As you may have noticed, the above mouth-watering brownie recipe does have ratings, but they do not appear in the search result snippet for that page:

brownie search rich snippet

as they are using a system other than microformats and RDFa.

More Rich Snippet support will be added in the future for markup that is helpful to searchers and that gains wide use among webmasters. E-Commerce sites, in particular, may be likely to benefit.

Which system should you use and how should you use it? Stay tuned for the next blog post on semantic markup and Rich Snippets! In the meantime, if you have your own opinions on the use of semantic markup, let us know in the comments below.

November 12th, 2009 by aviva b
Posted in SEO 7 Comments »

Are We Compatible?

When it comes to marriage, it’s important that you be compatible with your spouse. When it comes to SEO, it’s important that you be compatible with everyone – those who use Internet Explorer and those who use Chrome; those who embrace every new technology the web has to offer, and those who surf on waves of text-only browsers.

How do you know whether your site will be compatible with them all?

One useful service for checking how any particular URL will display on different browsers is BrowerShots. They offer the ability (free!) to check how your URL will display on numerous different browsers, with the options to choose the screen size and color depth, as well as whether you want Java, Javascript and/or Flash enabled or disabled.

Although highly useful (especially if you don’t have all these browsers installed on your computer), oftentimes BrowserShots would time out before loading all of the screenshots I wanted to view.

In these cases, or if you want to check multiple URLs on a single domain quickly, the following are directions on how to disable Javascript and Flash in common browsers. The version in parentheses is the version that I tested the instructions on; they may well work in earlier/later versions as well – but you’ll have to try that yourself. If you have any comments or tips about other versions and/or browsers, please enlighten us all in the comments below!

Internet Explorer (8.0)

Disabling Javascript:

  1. Go to the Tools menu.
  2. Click on Internet Options (all the way at the bottom).
  3. Click on the Security tab.
  4. Click the “Custom Level” button.
  5. Scroll down to where it says “Active Scripting” and click “Disable”.
  6. Click OK.
  7. Click Yes.
  8. Click OK.

Disabling Flash:

The Toggle Flash add-on disables and re-enables any Flash banner by clicking the Toggle Flash button in your toolbar. To install and use Toggle Flash:

  1. Download Toggle Flash. In order to use Toggle Flash, you must have Microsoft .NET 2.0 Framework or one of the later service packs installed.
  2. Close Internet Explorer and install Toggle Flash.
  3. Re-open Internet Explorer. The Toggle Flash button (a red circle with the Flash “f” symbol in the middle and a line through it) should be present in your command bar (the toolbar with the homepage button, printer button, etc.).
  4. If you don’t see it, you may need to resize your command bar. Right-click on an empty space in the command bar and uncheck “Lock the Toolbars” in the pop-up menu.
  5. Put your mouse over the line that appears and the cursor will change to a bi-directional arrow. Drag the line to expand the toolbar until the Toggle Flash icon appears. You can then re-lock the toolbars.
  6. Click the Toggle Flash button to turn Flash off. The button will not show a depression, making it hard to know whether it really worked or not, but if you visit a site with Flash, the Flash will not display and you may receive a message telling you that you need to download the latest Flash player or a similar message.
  7. In order to show the Flash, click the Toggle Flash button again and reload the page.

Mozilla Firefox (3.0.13)

Disabling Javascript:

  1. Go to the Tools menu.
  2. Click on Options (towards the bottom).
  3. Uncheck the “Enable Javascript” box.
  4. Click OK.

Disabling Flash:

The Flashblock add-on automatically disables any Flash banner, indicating its presence as a grey button that fluctuates between the Flash “f” symbol and a “play” arrow. If you click on the button, it will display the Flash. This add-on is incredibly convenient, not only for testing browser compatibility, but also for eliminating annoying Flash ads from displaying during your regular surfing of the internet.

Google Chrome (4.0.206.1 – dev version; should work on latest stable version as well)

Disabling Javascript:

  1. Right-click on the Google Chrome icon found on your desktop.
  2. Click on Properties.
  3. Click on the Shortcuts tab.
  4. In the “Target” field, where it says something to the effect of “C:\Documents and Settings\username\Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe”, add a space and then “-disable-javascript” (without the quotes)
  5. Restart Chrome.

Disabling Flash

Okay, this Flashblock works the same way as the Firefox one, but the installation is a tad more complicated than clicking “Install”. Hold on tight…

  1. Go to the page containing the Flashblock user script. Copy the script into a Notepad file and save it as a text document as “Flashblock.user.js” (the name “Flashblock” is not crucial; the “.user.js” suffix is).
  2. Find your Default user data folder for Chrome.

· In Windows XP, the pathway is: \Documents and Settings\username\Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default

· In Windows Vista the pathway is: \Users\username\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default

* If you are using Explorer to find the folder, you may need to tell it to display hidden folders by going to the Tools menu, clicking “Folder Options”, clicking the “View” tab and selecting “Show hidden files and folders” (towards the bottom of the list of options).

3. Create a new folder within the Default folder entitled User Scripts.

4. Copy your Flashblock.user.js file into the User Scripts folder.

5. Right-click on the Google Chrome icon found on your desktop.

  1. Click on Properties.
  2. Click on the Shortcuts tab.
  3. In the “Target” field, where it says something to the effect of “C:\Documents and Settings\username\Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe”, add a space and then “–enable-user-scripts” (without the quotes – and make sure the first hyphen is doubled)
  4. Restart Chrome.

Note: In order to display Flash permanently for any site, press Alt+F.

Yet another note: On Chrome, you cannot block Flash and Javascript at the same time. Putting “-disable-javascript” into the target field will disable your userscript that runs Flashblock. *sigh*

Happy browsing!

References:

www.mistered.us/tips/javascript/browsers.shtml

http://www.simplehelp.net/2008/04/07/how-to-temporarily-disable-flash-in-internet-explorer-7/

http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid=5e291648113cc731&hl=en

http://www.chromeplugins.org/google/chrome-plugins/block-flash-disable-most-visited-sites-7491.html

http://www.chromeplugins.org/google/chrome-talk/userscripts-chrome-7483.html

http://dev.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel

September 7th, 2009 by aviva b
Posted in SEO Leave a comment »

Why Is Your Site Not Ranking? The Reason (in Rhyme)

So you want your site
To rank up high
We have quite a job
I’ll tell you why

When we search for your keyword
Your site does view
Way down on the list
Rank three hundred and two

Your homepage has five versions
.html, .php
/index, /default
And the original, you see

Your links are all Java
Your navigation’s in Flash
Google has just one page of yours
Stored in its cache

Your title and description tags
Are all the same
The only keyword that refers surfers
Is your name

URLs are dynamic
Lots of errors in your code
Your homepage takes
Two minutes to load

Half your site content
Is password protected
Including “Terms of Use” –
Plagiarism, you suspected?

Your PageRank is zero
Backlinks twenty-one
But eleven from link farms
Ten from the blog of your son

Bumping your site up
Won’t be easy
And rapid acceleration
Can make one queasy

But hold on tight
And we’ll give it a go
Search Engine Overhaul
That’s SEO

September 2nd, 2009 by aviva b
Posted in SEO 9 Comments »

Research is Key(words)

Rand Fishkin of SEOMoz wrote a recent blog post about different strategies and tools for keyword research with excellent tips on how to effectively gather and organize data. Most of the tools he covered, however, work primarily for keyword research in English, and especially well for keywords that have higher search volume. If you are doing keyword research for a site in Hebrew, or in Swahili, or in Afrikaans, you have far less tools at your disposal. Even if a tool works in your language of choice (including English), there may not be enough search volume in your language or in your country of research to return results, as happens with Google Trends.

One of the most helpful ways to conduct research for these “lower search volume” keywords is to use Google Adwords. Not just the Adwords Keyword Tool – which may or may not be helpful in your case – but an actual Google Adwords campaign. By seeing how often your ads appear for the keywords you indicate, you can get a more accurate idea of how many people are searching for those keywords.

In general, when you set up an Adwords campaign, you want your ad to appear as high as possible in the search results, as long as you don’t have to pay too much. When you run a research campaign, however, you want to set your bid high enough that the ad appears, but low enough that the ad appears towards the low end of the search results (i.e. positions 7-10). This way you reduce the chances that people will click on your ad, reducing the amount of money you need to spend. You can get an idea of how high to set your maximum bid by using Adwords Traffic Estimator.

Google Adwords Traffic Estimator Screenshot 1

Start out by putting your keywords into the entry field, as seen above, using quotation marks if you want exact match (which you will probably choose if your keyword research is to determine which of several similar phrases people search for more). Do not choose a Max CPC, but do indicate your currency, language and country of interest.

Results:

Google Adwords Traffic Estimator Screenshot 2

Note that the bid amounts that are returned are enough to place the ad in positions 1-3 – not what we want for our research. Continue entering lower and lower amounts into the “Maximum CPC” field and clicking “Get New Estimates” until the Estimated Ad Positions show 7-10. See what the minimum amount is that you can enter and have it stay 7-10 (any lower will take you off the first page and severely minimize your chances of the ad showing at all, even if people do enter your keywords).

Google Adwords Traffic Estimator Screenshot 3

With prices like these, even if a few people do click on your ad, it won’t cost you so much – a bargain for effective keyword research. (Why Google estimates your daily expenses as $1 if they estimate 0 clicks at 6 cents apiece is a bit of a mystery… so you won’t be upset at them if you actually have to pay something?) Make sure to have a real landing page for your ad – if someone does click, you might gain a customer in addition to the information.

You now have the information you need to set up your research campaign, but these numbers are only an approximation. After your campaign is up and running, check frequently to make sure that your ads are showing, and showing in the position you want. You may need to adjust your bid up or down. Make sure – as mentioned above – that you indicate exact match for your keywords in order to get accurate information if you want to compare frequency of similar keywords (which would have a chance of appearing for each other if broad match was chosen), unless you are using Analytics filters that enable you to see exact keywords which sent visitors to your landing page.

After you have let the ads run for a significant period of time (still monitoring frequently to ensure that your campaign is running effectively), gather and analyze your data to see which keywords received the most impressions.

Impressions from a Google Adwords campaign overview

Happy campaigning!

July 27th, 2009 by aviva b
Posted in SEO, Uncategorized 2 Comments »

« Previous Entries